Discussion about this post

User's avatar
✮✩Write Sober, Edit Sober ✩✮'s avatar

As someone who’s always wanted to get married I can’t help but agree with you🫠. The idea of “love” marriage does make me roll my eyes because as you rightly say it is not. Marriage was never about love… even in the “olden days” with castles and pretty gowns…it was always about ownership, property, dowry, it was an investment. You can be madly in love and get married but the “marriage” the “ceremony” ain’t love at all! 🤷🏽‍♀️

Preeti P's avatar

Absolutely. Marriage will always be a property contract. The idea of "love marriage" is extremely new. Since I'm Indian American I learned the two sides, the "love marriage" as well as "arranged marriage" which really puts it all into focus. When I was younger Suze Orman spent a lot of time talking about understanding finances before marriage. She's not credible in many ways, but she was one of the few women talking that angle in the 90's/early 2000's. All marriage is enslavement so I would tell all women never enter that contract, BUT if she has no meaningful choices at the least she must study up on finances so she's not clueless going in and learns how to setup separate ER funds to protect herself.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?